Skip to main content

WHEN "HANDS" BECOME A PERSON: Campaigning on a very narrow trail.

Many years ago I was teaching an Introduction to Women's Studies course and the class was stuck on the concept of objectification. After trying unsuccessfully to explain and getting ready to call it quits, a Chicano student raised his hand to help and very clearly and concisely defined the term, providing clarity to his classmates.

At the end of the class I congratulated him on doing a good job and asked him how he understood it so well. He responded with something to the effect of "I am Texan, in Texas people like me are referred to as 'hands'; we are either 'good hands' or 'bad hands', but just 'hands'. If we are not 'hands', we either don't exist or are a threat to growers. We are never fully people."

It was my first time hearing the term "hands" to refer to agricultural workers. I would later hear it when a grower was upset that one of his "good hands" was participating in a lawsuit for unpaid wages. It wasn't a "I can't believe I failed my good 'hands' by miscalculating wage payments" sentiment, it was more of a "I can't believe these good 'hands' have the nerve to demand I treat them as a person, my good 'hands' betrayed me by asking me to see him as a person" kind of sentiment.

Last night's Democratic debate reminded me of the notion of "hands." I signed on late in the debate, only after all of the commentary about Julian Castro being rude had already spread. I missed the moment, so later I went back to see it. I saw a white man take up a brown man's time. I saw a white man's face red with what seemed to be rage because a brown man was brownsplaining his health care plan to him. I saw a brown man call a white man out with less than a smile on his face.

And that was the transgression Castro committed last night. In the political landscape, so far Castro has been liked for being "good hands"- sweet, friendly, does the party work without complaining much, challenge white men with little to no power who may become threats to white men of greater power, but that is all "good hands" are allowed to do and be. THEY CANNOT COME INTO THEIR OWN POWER.

This is the challenge non-traditional candidates face. They must run for a position that requires them to be full people, but stick as closely as possible to the most acceptable version of the stories they were born into. Castro's sin was akin to "good hands" bringing a suit for unpaid wages-thinking that he was equal in personhood to the grower (Biden) and believing that other people accept that he is equal to the grower (the audience). A truth is that even in 2019, even after years of economic uncertainty, Americans still relate more to the grower enraged that he is being called to account for breaking the law than they can relate to the "good hands", the worker, behaving as though he walks in respect.


But here are some 2020 questions, how many "hands" are tired of being "hands." How many will come out for a party that still sees them as "hands." Castro's failure last night was a failure of not sticking to one acceptable story. It is a danger a lot of other candidates run, Kamala can't risk a moment of rage, Pete can't risk a moment of untraditional masculinity, Booker covers his rage with laughter-what happens when he forgets to do that? I can go on and on...and the most important part for the Democratic Party in these moments will not be what happened, but how they talk about what happened. Can Castro rise only as long as he is "good hands" or is he allowed to be more than that?How Democrats talk about that (and other future narrative transgressions) will determine who comes out to vote in 2020.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INSPIRATION

This is one of my favorite paintings because it is so unexpected. It is not of my typical style or executed the way I would've have liked to see it executed. Instead, I love this picture because it reminds me that you never know what can be inspired by what. I did this painting after a trip to Vermont during the fall. I assumed I would have been inspired to paint organic images and shapes, but instead, I was inspired to paint primary colors in squares and triangles.

WHAT PRESENCE OF "BIRTHERS" TELLS US ABOUT WHAT IT MEANS TO TRULY BELONG IN AMERICA

It appears Trump has been satisfied with the long form of President Barak Obama's birth certificate. I guess the various affirmations and certifications from Hawaii's officers that he was in fact born in Hawaii were not enough. Trump may be satisfied, but the rest of the birthers are not. Frankly, they never will be. Fundamentally, they are not so much concerned with whether he was born or not born in the U.S. Their concern is whether he is a "Citizen" in the truest and purest meaning of the word. Whether he is a human being endowed with rational thought and entitled to the same rights as any other human being who is endowed with rational thought as they imagine themselves to be. In other words, is he just as important to society as they are? Is he as human as they are? They would like the answer to be no. What I always find fascinating about the birthers' position is that they have never challenged President Obama's mother's citizenship. They have onl...

I CAN'T PASS JUDGMENT ANYMORE

I know all of my friends are loving the ease and convenience of carrying books around on a Kindle, or whatever the gadget of the day is, but this move to electronic reading is really affecting my ability to judge others, yes, you heard me right-judging others is now difficult. It used to be that I could sit on the train and just by watching book covers, and their respective readers, I would get an idea of what books I might like. Now, everyone has a kindle and I can't really derive reading recommendations without appearing to be a stalker. But worse than that, new friendships are severely affected. I used to be able to walk into someone's house and look at their bookcase and know whether I should run the other way-now, the non-visibility of books makes identifying incompatibility so much more difficult. For example, if someone were to walk into my house, this is what they might see:   You would be correct in making quite a few assumptions about me based on this ...