Skip to main content

THE SCOTTSBORO BOYS: DE-ROMANTICIZING AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS

Historic marker and courthouse where the Scottsboro Trials were conducted

I came to the United States as an overachieving teenager. I spent my first summer trying to catch up on all that was American History. I knew I would get along in Math and Sciences, but social studies and history would be what would take me from teacher's pet to just meh.

I read voraciously. My concerns over history are obvious; I would be behind my classmates by years. Social Studies was a different beast. My country was known for its corruption, and the U.S. was known for the integrity of its institutions. American institutions were so strong and incorruptible, it gave the entire country free reign to advise and intervene in the governance of other countries, whether or not by invitation. I was excited to learn about this way, maybe I could figure out how to take it home one day.

I read every word on every page in every textbook;  I thought books in the U.S were laid out the way ours were. In the margins of the chapters were information boxes; back home those were reminders of something you should have already learned and was relevant to the new content you were being introduced to.

I assumed they meant the same thing in the U.S. so whenever I would see those boxes, I would read them, then go to the library to learn more about the subject. I later learned those boxes weren't topics we were all supposed to have learned about American history or civics. They served to frame the main story, simultaneously signaling they shaped the main story, but were not themselves worth learning.

Amongst these boxes I found a reference to the Scottsboro Boys and their importance to America's notion of Due Process. I knew those values, they were one of the founding principles of the American Revolution, French Revolution, Haitian Revolution, OUR revolution. I had landed on a treasure, this was how Americans maintained the integrity of their institutions.

But I learned that American institutions are not infallible. I learned that in spite of an aspiration of equality, there was a time only the opinion of white male jurors mattered. I learned that there could be an entire trial where the outcome was predetermined. I learned that the words of some people mattered more than the words of others. I learned that a system could so favor one group over the other, the individual personalities and values could be overwhelmed. I learned that the integrity of institutions depended on the integrity of the people who guarded them and I learned that those boxes were essential to my understanding of the United States.

Visiting Scottsboro, AL reminded me of how few Americans know this story and its significance; how essential it is in understanding that our institutions can fail. The story eroded my naivete and reinforced the necessity of being involved in the institutions that affect our lives. I am grateful I took the time to read all of those boxes. I learned more about who we are as a nation from them than I did from the chapters.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INSPIRATION

This is one of my favorite paintings because it is so unexpected. It is not of my typical style or executed the way I would've have liked to see it executed. Instead, I love this picture because it reminds me that you never know what can be inspired by what. I did this painting after a trip to Vermont during the fall. I assumed I would have been inspired to paint organic images and shapes, but instead, I was inspired to paint primary colors in squares and triangles.

WHAT PRESENCE OF "BIRTHERS" TELLS US ABOUT WHAT IT MEANS TO TRULY BELONG IN AMERICA

It appears Trump has been satisfied with the long form of President Barak Obama's birth certificate. I guess the various affirmations and certifications from Hawaii's officers that he was in fact born in Hawaii were not enough. Trump may be satisfied, but the rest of the birthers are not. Frankly, they never will be. Fundamentally, they are not so much concerned with whether he was born or not born in the U.S. Their concern is whether he is a "Citizen" in the truest and purest meaning of the word. Whether he is a human being endowed with rational thought and entitled to the same rights as any other human being who is endowed with rational thought as they imagine themselves to be. In other words, is he just as important to society as they are? Is he as human as they are? They would like the answer to be no. What I always find fascinating about the birthers' position is that they have never challenged President Obama's mother's citizenship. They have onl...

I CAN'T PASS JUDGMENT ANYMORE

I know all of my friends are loving the ease and convenience of carrying books around on a Kindle, or whatever the gadget of the day is, but this move to electronic reading is really affecting my ability to judge others, yes, you heard me right-judging others is now difficult. It used to be that I could sit on the train and just by watching book covers, and their respective readers, I would get an idea of what books I might like. Now, everyone has a kindle and I can't really derive reading recommendations without appearing to be a stalker. But worse than that, new friendships are severely affected. I used to be able to walk into someone's house and look at their bookcase and know whether I should run the other way-now, the non-visibility of books makes identifying incompatibility so much more difficult. For example, if someone were to walk into my house, this is what they might see:   You would be correct in making quite a few assumptions about me based on this ...