Skip to main content

WHEN IT COMES TO TYRANNY; THE WORLD IS FLAT

In 2005, economist Thomas Friedman wrote that the world, for economic purposes, was flat. In other words, that technological advances were such that a guy in Afghanistan could compete with a woman in Iceland for the dollars of a tweenager in Canada (my poor attempt at illustrating his point). If you haven't read the book by now, go read it to make the writing of this blog entry easier for me.

I now argue that perhaps, barriers to entry into tyranny have been removed and when it comes to torture and extrajudicial killings, the world is also flat. Today, the thought crossed my mind that maybe, the same way economies have flattened, so have cultural and political values. I came to this conclusion because I saw several governmental entities engage in torture with impunity, but noticed that only some have been called out for that torture, while others weren't. I have also seen that extra-judicial killings happen regularly in the U.S. without being called extra-judicial killings; a term only used when similar actions occur in countries we consider undemocratic. In other words, public discourse in the U.S. deflects from the lived realities of Americans and their similarities to folks in other parts of the world, the fact is that today you can be tortured with impunity or killed extrajudicially by a democratic government, a military dictatorship, a theocracy, all or any.

To illustrate, today Otto Wambrier passed away. He was the kid who snuck into North Korea, was charged with a crime, given a one hour trial, quickly found guilty and was held for  approximately 17 months by the North Korean government. He was returned to his family in a coma and passed away today. Today is the day the U.S. Supreme Court issued their decision in Ziglar v. Abbasi, et.al. This was the case brought by several men for having been detained and tortured for anywhere from 6-8 months by the Federal government and they were seeking restitution. These men had not been arraigned, had no trial and were simply held and tortured by the U.S. government. The U.S. Supreme Court said that was okay.

Yesterday Charleena Lyles was shot by the Seattle police after she called to report a burglary. She had no arraignment, no trial, she was just executed...and Friday, the officer who murdered Philando Castile was acquitted.  Castile had no arraignment, no trial and his execution was swift. Had either of these murders occurred in the global south, or in a dictatorship, they would have been condemned as tyrannical.

As Friedman argued for economics, I argue the same for tyranny; barriers to entry have been removed. The U.S. Constitution, and constitutions generally, used to be democratic documents that once prevented undemocratic behaviors and protected against tyranny. But that barrier to entry into tyranny has been re-envisioned and effectively removed, so that whether you are in North Korea or the U.S., El Salvador or the U.S. you can experience tyranny with impunity wherever you are, under whatever form of government you are under. It is time to remove tyranny altogether and the only way to do that is to forget how we label actors and instead condemn the acts. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INSPIRATION

This is one of my favorite paintings because it is so unexpected. It is not of my typical style or executed the way I would've have liked to see it executed. Instead, I love this picture because it reminds me that you never know what can be inspired by what. I did this painting after a trip to Vermont during the fall. I assumed I would have been inspired to paint organic images and shapes, but instead, I was inspired to paint primary colors in squares and triangles.

WHAT PRESENCE OF "BIRTHERS" TELLS US ABOUT WHAT IT MEANS TO TRULY BELONG IN AMERICA

It appears Trump has been satisfied with the long form of President Barak Obama's birth certificate. I guess the various affirmations and certifications from Hawaii's officers that he was in fact born in Hawaii were not enough. Trump may be satisfied, but the rest of the birthers are not. Frankly, they never will be. Fundamentally, they are not so much concerned with whether he was born or not born in the U.S. Their concern is whether he is a "Citizen" in the truest and purest meaning of the word. Whether he is a human being endowed with rational thought and entitled to the same rights as any other human being who is endowed with rational thought as they imagine themselves to be. In other words, is he just as important to society as they are? Is he as human as they are? They would like the answer to be no. What I always find fascinating about the birthers' position is that they have never challenged President Obama's mother's citizenship. They have onl...

I CAN'T PASS JUDGMENT ANYMORE

I know all of my friends are loving the ease and convenience of carrying books around on a Kindle, or whatever the gadget of the day is, but this move to electronic reading is really affecting my ability to judge others, yes, you heard me right-judging others is now difficult. It used to be that I could sit on the train and just by watching book covers, and their respective readers, I would get an idea of what books I might like. Now, everyone has a kindle and I can't really derive reading recommendations without appearing to be a stalker. But worse than that, new friendships are severely affected. I used to be able to walk into someone's house and look at their bookcase and know whether I should run the other way-now, the non-visibility of books makes identifying incompatibility so much more difficult. For example, if someone were to walk into my house, this is what they might see:   You would be correct in making quite a few assumptions about me based on this ...