Skip to main content

A Kinda Explainer on the Muslim Ban

Yesterday the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) made what are essentially two positions, but many are conflating into one. In Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project, SCOTUS agreed to first, grant certiorari and hear whether the Muslim Ban issued earlier this year is legal and second to partially lift the injunction from the lower courts.

Because the procedure is a little bit complicated, people have many things confused. So here are some clarifications:

1. The initial (Executive Order) ban was for a period of 90 days to allow the government to develop new rules.
2. The countries covered are Somalia, Sudan, Iran, Syria, Yemen and Lybia
3. The initial ban exclusively targeted Muslims
4. A second ban was drafted to cure some of the legal problems found in the initial ban
5. The second ban covers EVERYONE from those six countries regardless of faith
6. Both the Fourth and the Ninth Circuits issued injunctions preventing the implementation of these Executive Orders
7. The second 90 day period expired June 14
8. A third Executive Order was drafted to state that the 90 days will start counting when a Court allows the implementation of this ban
9. To date there have been no new regulations drafted
10. SCOTUS agreed to hear arguments in October which is when the new rules should be drafted
11. Anyone with a bona fide relationship to the U.S. may proceed with their immigration cases
12. Anyone with no bona fide relationship to the U.S. from those countries will not be allowed in until further notice


In other words, this is all super ambiguous-but as of right now, if you have immediate relatives from the enumerated countries petition for them ASAP!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INSPIRATION

This is one of my favorite paintings because it is so unexpected. It is not of my typical style or executed the way I would've have liked to see it executed. Instead, I love this picture because it reminds me that you never know what can be inspired by what. I did this painting after a trip to Vermont during the fall. I assumed I would have been inspired to paint organic images and shapes, but instead, I was inspired to paint primary colors in squares and triangles.

WHAT PRESENCE OF "BIRTHERS" TELLS US ABOUT WHAT IT MEANS TO TRULY BELONG IN AMERICA

It appears Trump has been satisfied with the long form of President Barak Obama's birth certificate. I guess the various affirmations and certifications from Hawaii's officers that he was in fact born in Hawaii were not enough. Trump may be satisfied, but the rest of the birthers are not. Frankly, they never will be. Fundamentally, they are not so much concerned with whether he was born or not born in the U.S. Their concern is whether he is a "Citizen" in the truest and purest meaning of the word. Whether he is a human being endowed with rational thought and entitled to the same rights as any other human being who is endowed with rational thought as they imagine themselves to be. In other words, is he just as important to society as they are? Is he as human as they are? They would like the answer to be no. What I always find fascinating about the birthers' position is that they have never challenged President Obama's mother's citizenship. They have onl...

I CAN'T PASS JUDGMENT ANYMORE

I know all of my friends are loving the ease and convenience of carrying books around on a Kindle, or whatever the gadget of the day is, but this move to electronic reading is really affecting my ability to judge others, yes, you heard me right-judging others is now difficult. It used to be that I could sit on the train and just by watching book covers, and their respective readers, I would get an idea of what books I might like. Now, everyone has a kindle and I can't really derive reading recommendations without appearing to be a stalker. But worse than that, new friendships are severely affected. I used to be able to walk into someone's house and look at their bookcase and know whether I should run the other way-now, the non-visibility of books makes identifying incompatibility so much more difficult. For example, if someone were to walk into my house, this is what they might see:   You would be correct in making quite a few assumptions about me based on this ...