Skip to main content

THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IS DRIVING ME BATS!

Something is afoot at the SCOTUS. I don't know what it is...but it is causing great confusion. Unless you lived under a rock, you would've heard by now of the decision in Citizens United v. F.E.C., where the SCOTUS held that corporations were entitled to the same free speech rights human individuals are entitled to, and therefore there should be no limits to corporate contributions to political campaigns (as money is the primary way corporations communicate). Everyone from the far right to the far left was outraged and only foreign interests and big corporations were overjoyed. We will likely not see much of the consequences of this decision until the Fall of this year.

Today the SCOTUS decides in Holden v Humanitarian Law Project that it is constitutional to criminally prosecute individuals who provide material support to organizations designated as terrorist organizations by the State Department. What does one case have to do with the other? Hear me out. I go off on tangents sometimes. The Supreme Court determined that "material support" not only included the person who sends money to...let's say Hamas so they could bomb us, but that material support also includes giving money to...let's say Hamas, so they could continue to run their clinic for the destitute. "Material support" also includes advising Hamas NOT TO BOMB US! They did carve out an exception for domestic terrorist organizations.

Okay, so here's my point...or actually my question. If you put these two cases together, it sounds something like this. Hamas could make political campaign contributions to anyone of my legislators and that would be lawful. I, on the other hand, could be prosecuted for advising Hamas not to bomb us or for contributing to their clinic for the destitute (and let's assume it's the clinic in the region where Hamas are the only ones providing services, which apparently is the case in much of the Palestinian territories)...but I couldn't be prosecuted for contributing money to the Keystone State Skinheads, money which they use to bomb a federal building (unless I had specific knowledge they were going to bomb that specific federal building) even though I had a pretty good hunch that's what they might do and that's what they are known for. Am I reading these cases incorrectly? Can someone give some additional insight?

It seems as though fundamentally the SCOTUS is saying that as long as people or organizations are rich, we don't care what influence they have on our government; as long as Americans die in the hands of other Americans we are fine, it's just when foreigners kill Americans that we get angry...and if there's a way to stop terrorism, slow it down or even use those organizations to keep a few poor people alive, that's where we'll draw the line. Does this makes sense to anyone? Please write if you interpret the cases differently than I do.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THOUGHTS ON MOTHERS, FASHION AND BODY IMAGE

It wasn't until I was 13 years old that I learned I was fat. That was the year I moved to the United States and began to have a difficult time finding clothes that fit appropriately. I never really thought about that change until much later when I would look back on childhood photos and was surprised by how well my clothes fit, and how well-dressed I mostly was. As someone who is very fashionably challenged, I was surprised that at some point in time, I knew how to dress well...and I seemed to have lost the skill once I had many clothing options. When did I lose that skill? I began to explore that phenomena and quickly came to an odd realization. In the U.S. I clearly always had more clothing options that I ever did in Venezuela. Ready-made clothes in the U.S. were affordable so everyone could buy them. That was the key, in Venezuela, ready-made clothes were very expensive, so not too many people purchased them. In fact, I don't remember my mom buying anything ready-mad...
Post a Comment
Read more

I CAN'T PASS JUDGMENT ANYMORE

I know all of my friends are loving the ease and convenience of carrying books around on a Kindle, or whatever the gadget of the day is, but this move to electronic reading is really affecting my ability to judge others, yes, you heard me right-judging others is now difficult. It used to be that I could sit on the train and just by watching book covers, and their respective readers, I would get an idea of what books I might like. Now, everyone has a kindle and I can't really derive reading recommendations without appearing to be a stalker. But worse than that, new friendships are severely affected. I used to be able to walk into someone's house and look at their bookcase and know whether I should run the other way-now, the non-visibility of books makes identifying incompatibility so much more difficult. For example, if someone were to walk into my house, this is what they might see:   You would be correct in making quite a few assumptions about me based on this ...
2 comments
Read more

MOTHERHOOD: A SITE OF VICIOUS NEGOTIATION

I woke up this morning to a baby puking on me while smiling unapologetically. For the first time her lack of inhibition worried me. This Mother's Day, I thought I'd be reflecting on being a mother for the first time and jot down some mushy words, instead, I think back to the day I walked in on my mom having greater aspirations for my daughter than she did for me.   My dad raised me to thrive in the world I deserved, my mom raised me to survive in the world I was born into. Needles to say, my dad's parenting was liberating and empowering, my mom's was stifling and suffocating, so of the two parents I always rebelled against HER. She would often say that I was created fighting her given how difficult her pregnancy was with me. She was right, my earliest memories with my mom are of our arguments. We fought like the swords of two warriors: I was driven by a desire to be free and capable, her by fear that I might suffer consequences the patriarchy metes out to misbehaving wo...
Post a Comment
Read more