Skip to main content

THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IS DRIVING ME BATS!

Something is afoot at the SCOTUS. I don't know what it is...but it is causing great confusion. Unless you lived under a rock, you would've heard by now of the decision in Citizens United v. F.E.C., where the SCOTUS held that corporations were entitled to the same free speech rights human individuals are entitled to, and therefore there should be no limits to corporate contributions to political campaigns (as money is the primary way corporations communicate). Everyone from the far right to the far left was outraged and only foreign interests and big corporations were overjoyed. We will likely not see much of the consequences of this decision until the Fall of this year.

Today the SCOTUS decides in Holden v Humanitarian Law Project that it is constitutional to criminally prosecute individuals who provide material support to organizations designated as terrorist organizations by the State Department. What does one case have to do with the other? Hear me out. I go off on tangents sometimes. The Supreme Court determined that "material support" not only included the person who sends money to...let's say Hamas so they could bomb us, but that material support also includes giving money to...let's say Hamas, so they could continue to run their clinic for the destitute. "Material support" also includes advising Hamas NOT TO BOMB US! They did carve out an exception for domestic terrorist organizations.

Okay, so here's my point...or actually my question. If you put these two cases together, it sounds something like this. Hamas could make political campaign contributions to anyone of my legislators and that would be lawful. I, on the other hand, could be prosecuted for advising Hamas not to bomb us or for contributing to their clinic for the destitute (and let's assume it's the clinic in the region where Hamas are the only ones providing services, which apparently is the case in much of the Palestinian territories)...but I couldn't be prosecuted for contributing money to the Keystone State Skinheads, money which they use to bomb a federal building (unless I had specific knowledge they were going to bomb that specific federal building) even though I had a pretty good hunch that's what they might do and that's what they are known for. Am I reading these cases incorrectly? Can someone give some additional insight?

It seems as though fundamentally the SCOTUS is saying that as long as people or organizations are rich, we don't care what influence they have on our government; as long as Americans die in the hands of other Americans we are fine, it's just when foreigners kill Americans that we get angry...and if there's a way to stop terrorism, slow it down or even use those organizations to keep a few poor people alive, that's where we'll draw the line. Does this makes sense to anyone? Please write if you interpret the cases differently than I do.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I CAN'T PASS JUDGMENT ANYMORE

I know all of my friends are loving the ease and convenience of carrying books around on a Kindle, or whatever the gadget of the day is, but this move to electronic reading is really affecting my ability to judge others, yes, you heard me right-judging others is now difficult. It used to be that I could sit on the train and just by watching book covers, and their respective readers, I would get an idea of what books I might like. Now, everyone has a kindle and I can't really derive reading recommendations without appearing to be a stalker. But worse than that, new friendships are severely affected. I used to be able to walk into someone's house and look at their bookcase and know whether I should run the other way-now, the non-visibility of books makes identifying incompatibility so much more difficult. For example, if someone were to walk into my house, this is what they might see:   You would be correct in making quite a few assumptions about me based on this ...
2 comments
Read more

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: AMERICAN FLAVORED APARTHEID

I remember being a young adult and cramming into a van with 26 other people: this van was designed to hold only nine. Had I been wealthier, I could have gotten on a nicer and safer bus, but I was not wealthy and had to get home ASAP. I hated my country for things like that and loved America because America had nice buses, no overcrowded bus. I had been on American buses and trains while on vacation and they felt glamorous compared to what I had to get on on a regular basis. Years later, I would move to America. I would depend on public transportation to get to work, school and leisure. I lived at the border between a wealthy area and modest one, lucky enough to have been assigned to the wealthier neighborhood's school system. It turns out, PT in America was not that glamorous. The fleets were nicer, but the routes and expense couldn't get me to where I WANTED to be. They were good enough to get me to where OTHERS wanted me to be. I have since moved around and lived all ov...
1 comment
Read more

THE INVISIBLE COST OF TRAUMA AND WHY IT IS HARD TO SEE

Every day I look out of my back door and stare at two beautiful Pine trees. Those who don't know their histories see two well-formed plants that cast shadows, clean air and house neighborhood critters. I, on the other hand, see missed opportunities. Only after looking at what was lost among those trees could I begin to conceptualize how much good has been removed from the human experience due to trauma. I bought my home in 2006 and can assure you that the two Pine trees were planted and transplanted at the same time; they were nurtured (or not) by me in the same amounts. Both trees grew at the same pace for about nine years. Over a year ago there was a huge snow storm that toppled the Pine tree on the left. I tied it back up hoping it wouldn't die. Sure enough, the Pine tree was resilient and survived. In fact, if you were to look at it today you would not know that it once fell over and looks like a model Pine tree. People often see survivors of trauma after they have ...
1 comment
Read more