Skip to main content

Why do we subsidize our employers with our money and our health?


I just ran into this old article which reminded me of something I read a few weeks ago. That more recent article (which I can't find because I am aging disgracefully) talked jokingly about how Americans eat too much fast food. The article was not substantive, but American commenters were very upset because Europeans don't understand convenience.

The argument was that Americans eat fast food frequently because it is convenient to their lifestyle. Which made me realize just how much the American worker has embraced their employers' needs as their own...while their employers simultaneously fight against the needs of their workers, even for things as simple as a living wage.

Let's be clear: Americans eat fast food because their employers give them very limited time to eat. This creates two problems: 1. Americans eat unhealthy food that is readily available and filled with empty calories and 2. Americans spend more money on that less nutritious food to increase their availability to their employers. (Think about the cost of making one plate of pasta, shrimp and capers v. a McDonald's meal-where I live, the shrimp meal would be cheaper if I only had the time to prepare it)

By embracing "convenience" as a personal benefit and not as a necessity created by employers and their policies, workers continue to subsidize terrible and unhealthy business models. If employers were good at what they do, they would be able to make a living by paying their workers fair wages on fewer hours so their employees could have time to prepare and eat healthy foods. Anything less, and the employer essentially depends on the subsidy of their employees in order to exist. We live in an economic climate where most employers are bad at their business, so that they need their employees to subsidize their business endeavor with money, time and health. Any good business person would never depend on such a subsidy.

Here is the thing though, at what point in our history did Americans accept that this subsidy to their employers was anything other than a subsidy? Italian, Turkish and German workers go up in arms at attempts to cut the time they have to prepare and eat food. Mind you, Turkey and Germany are lending countries globally, while Italy is a borrowing country. What we see is that having an economy that fosters employers who don't need this subsidy from workers doesn't necessarily lead to either a good or bad macro economy, but an economy that requires this employee subsidy does lead to an unhealthy country.

So my question is, when are American workers going to take their time, health and money back?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

INTRODUCTION

How or where do I start? Well, more than a year ago I set up this space with the idea that I would blog my little heart out, but here I am now just barely starting off. You should know that I have no idea what I am doing and that I am finally doing this because, well, I don't know that either. I am a professional in my early 30's living in Central, PA. It is finally dawning on me that the job I am doing now is probably the job I will be doing for the rest of my life...great for "stability", but terrible for having something to look forward to. Don't get me wrong, I love my job, I help people all the time and my co-workers are wonderful, but it's almost like a courtship, I wish my profession would "court me" a little more, that it ought to worry that one day I wouldn't be here anymore and therefore should be nicer and more spontaneous with me. Does that sound odd? Probably, but that is how I feel...maybe it's a professional 7 year itch thing...
Post a Comment
Read more

WITH APOLOGIES TO MY BODY AND ONWARD WITH GRATITUDE

For the first 40 years of my life I hated you. As a young child I hated that you were neither fast nor strong, as a teenager I blamed you for not having the flexibility that could get me into Julliard, as I lifted weights, I was angry you were not strong enough and as I became a lawyer I hated you for being the kind of body that helped me be a good lawyer.  I didn't just hate you for my reasons; I also brought in people into my life that dumped their own self hate onto you and I agreed with them. You were blamed for their alcoholism, their inability to have an erection, and for holding erections for far too long, for their sex addictions, for their premature ejaculations and for their general unhappiness, what is worse; my hate for you was so strong, I could never fully trust anyone who loved you. But then last year I was in an accident. It would have killed anyone who had a different body than you. The insurance assessor assumed the owner of my car had died and my chiropr...
Post a Comment
Read more

MOTHERHOOD: A SITE OF VICIOUS NEGOTIATION

I woke up this morning to a baby puking on me while smiling unapologetically. For the first time her lack of inhibition worried me. This Mother's Day, I thought I'd be reflecting on being a mother for the first time and jot down some mushy words, instead, I think back to the day I walked in on my mom having greater aspirations for my daughter than she did for me.   My dad raised me to thrive in the world I deserved, my mom raised me to survive in the world I was born into. Needles to say, my dad's parenting was liberating and empowering, my mom's was stifling and suffocating, so of the two parents I always rebelled against HER. She would often say that I was created fighting her given how difficult her pregnancy was with me. She was right, my earliest memories with my mom are of our arguments. We fought like the swords of two warriors: I was driven by a desire to be free and capable, her by fear that I might suffer consequences the patriarchy metes out to misbehaving wo...
Post a Comment
Read more